In the future Legislation kills free online dating proposals
The pick up again upgrading from Count was trendy 2005, for instance the IAC launched Chemistry.
If the IAC can not innovate any more; I think the best strategy for Count is acquiring PlentyOfFish and so knock it as it is destroying OKCupid (IMHO).
Amongst USD 10 MILLION YOU CAN Jerk A Uncouple (OR Compensated) ONLINE DATING Setting Surpass THAN PLENTYOFFISH. WHY PAYING Supercilious THAN THAT? THE Database IS Out-of-date AT ALL, because:
1) Joining PLENTYOFFISH IS Savor Joining THE Armed forces. You can not invite to find the limit beautiful and spiky women represent for fantastic dating. Any man will see over 95% of women looks fat, unappetizing or not his type at PlentyOfFish. PlentyOfFish is mostly for venture daters, for fun, for flirting, for easing purposes, for quick contentment and not for fantastic daters looking for a long term relationship with assurance.
2) Mr. Markus Frind is the one ">3) Supercilious than 30% of PlentyOfFish users, salaried by the same token to a paying online dating site. They want to use PlentyOfFish for free, paying with lush time, but they salaried with back up to extensively sites.
4) The 2010 annual report revenue of PlentyOfFish was in the range of USD 30 million but aristocratic than 90% of the ads displayed at PlentyOfFish are from.. take as read.. paying online dating sites like Count.
5) Offer is no need to sign any NDA to restrain PlentyOfFish's come about. Mr. Markus Frind thinks PlentyOfFish is feature than USD 1,000 (one thousand) million, but if you (truthfully) flavor a dotcom company with the 1.5X revenue rule, it is not aristocratic than (luckily) USD 45 million.
0 comments:
Post a Comment