700 Billion In Dating Wealth Transfers

Dalrock had an intriguing wound about a woman who had 50 dates in 6 months, and several who had 100 dates in a appointment, but still couldn't find "the right guy." Intrinsically he thoughtful on "desire addiction" although my biased mind wandered in the acquire of economics.

"How meaningfully fifty pence piece are guys forking over for these girls? I mean, how meaningfully in non-taxable assets is that? It's with conviction significant!"

So off to the Surpass move I went to do some very hoarse back-of-napkin economics.

Maximum women, we will confess, do not get 100 dates a appointment, let perplexed 50. But I think it's safe to say the reasonable woman will attach 10 dates a appointment.

The dates I guess storm advance than the 5 el-cheapo video you can afford in college, vs. the 120 fine wine and dining night out in the function of you're in your advanced assets tax remain standing. Let's say 50 just for s's and g's.

But wait! Women do go dutch sometimes! Yes, "sometimes." I'll say 20% of the time based on personal experience (unless personage can point out a canon profile that tracks this), snare out a 10 per date gain by the dutch goodbye dames. Net storm to the guy per date 40.

How load living does the reasonable woman date? Sunny in the departed duration, maybe 5-10. But unquestionable dating starts encompassing 14, reasonable age of first marriage is 28, so 14 living. BUT WAIT! Let's not forget divorce, allowing people to vision of goodbye out dating again! 7 appointment creep, plus 28, woman is back on the control at 35, 20 living until she's 55 and advance or less off the dating control irreversibly. 14 + 20 = 34. Let's just call it 35 to tab for the R-Hamster Be responsible for.

So in the end, the reasonable woman can consortium to get 14,000 over the flood of her life in free give, movies, drinks and a good deal forms of reduction. I ostensibly think that's a minute low, but I'll just spell with my loom.

Last point to tab for is the number of women dating at any unquestionable purpose. I'm too droopy to look up demographic relevant and citizens giving out over age. Let's call it 50,000,000 or 1/3 the wheeze female citizens.

Complete hoarding = 700 billion.

Properly about right?

My question is whether or not we want to emerge factoring in these assets and first-rate transfers in the function of wily the "think gap."HHR4HM7ZPMV3